CANONIC Foundation

MammoChat OPTS–EGO Ledger

October 31, 2025

Dexter Hadley, MD/PhD

Founder & CEO, MammoChat

Lake Nona Medical City, Florida | iDrDex@MammoChat.com

MammoChat.com - Your Journey, Together.

Maria is a 47-year-old Catholic schoolteacher from Colombia who presented after a screening mammogram revealed a unilateral asymmetry. Biopsy confirmed stage I luminal A breast cancer. She underwent breast-conserving surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy without complication. After her divorce, she relocated to Florida to be closer to family but reported feeling isolated, anxious, and fearful. Her electronic health portals were in English only, and fragmented communication added to her distress. Social screening was consistent with moderate anxiety (GAD-7 = 13) and mild depression (PHQ-9 = 10).

Zaida is a 52-year-old software engineer of Pakistani heritage, an observant Muslim who lives alone and works remotely. She presented after noticing axillary fullness, and biopsy revealed node-positive, HER2-positive invasive ductal carcinoma. She began neoadjuvant HER2-directed therapy with plans for surgery and adjuvant radiation. Although her treatment was technologically advanced-with wearables, remote vitals, and EHR-linked data-Zaida described feeling watched but not understood. Frequent alerts disrupted her work and prayer routines, amplifying a sense of fear and isolation.

Founder’s Preface: From Awareness to Agency

Maria and Zaida both experienced fear, anxiety, and isolation during breast-cancer care. Both cases reflect how breast-cancer survivors can experience profound emotional distress despite excellent clinical care. Maria’s challenge stemmed from silence and disconnection through language and cultural barriers, whereas Zaida experienced mainly noise and intrusion through technology overload. For both women, the dominant theme was fear of being unseen that was only amplified by an inherent lack of empathy in navigating a complex health system.

The Problem. When I first understood women like Maria and Zaida, I realized they were two victims of the same broken health system. Maria’s silence came from language-a maze of English-only portals and clinical jargon that left her unseen. Zaida’s noise came from automation-wearables, dashboards, and constant alerts that left her unheard. Both experienced fear and isolation within systems built to measure but not to understand. MammoChat was founded to change that: to make compassion as quantifiable as precision, and connection as powerful as any biomarker.

The Vision. MammoChat fuses clinical medicine, artificial intelligence, and empathy by design. It doesn’t replace clinicians-it restores context. Every feature follows one organizing principle: listen first, explain clearly, act last. That discipline drives the OPTS-EGO Ledger, a foundation that transforms compliance into capability by linking trust, transparency, and consent into a single chain of care. Behind MammoChat’s conversational interface lies the mCODE framework, which organizes oncology data across institutions, and the OPTS-EGO Ledger, which secures consent and provenance for every shared record.(HL7 International 2024b; World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) 2013; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health 2014; [Grossman et al.]{.nocase} 2018) Together, they turn fragmented experiences into a continuous, patient-authored narrative of care([Robinson et al.]{.nocase} 2020).

Empathy as Architecture. In most AI systems, empathy is an interface; in MammoChat, it s infrastructure. Our conversational model validates emotion before delivering information-a design choice proven to improve retention, trust, and follow-through. For Maria, a bilingual chat interface and faith-aligned peer network restored agency and belonging. For Zaida, adaptive notifications and privacy-respecting scheduling reduced digital fatigue while honoring her faith practices. Empathy is not ornamental. It is structural-encoded into how data is interpreted, visualized, and shared.

From Compliance to Capability. For decades, privacy and provenance were seen as burdens. We see them as the engines of participation. The OPTS-EGO Ledger records every mammogram, biopsy, and lab note as a verified, patient-owned contribution to science. OPTS (Open Provenance Token Standard) ensures traceable data lineage; EGO (Ethical Governance Operators) secures integrity and consent validation. Together they transform records into relationships-creating the technical trust layer precision medicine has always needed.

From Awareness to Ownership. Breast Cancer Awareness Month taught the world to care; now it must teach the world to act. MammoChat converts awareness into ownership by giving women agency over how their data, stories, and insights shape research. Through the mCODE standard, we unify oncology data across systems;(Global Alliance for Genomics and Health 2022b) through empathy-native design, we unify patient experience across cultures The result is a platform where survivors become collaborators, and participation becomes the new prevention. Maria and Zaida’s stories represent two sides of the same truth: survivorship requires more than data and treatment-it demands understanding.

Policy into Practice. Every layer of MammoChat aligns with the public infrastructure of trust built over two decades-from HIPAA and HITECH to the 21st Century Cures Act and NIH’s Data Sharing Policy. What was once a paper right is now a living mechanism for transparency. By merging provenance with empathy, we bridge compliance and care, creating an open, ethical, and auditable ecosystem that turns regulation into resilience.

The Call Ahead. These cases anchor MammoChat’s $12 million Series A strategy to reach 20 000 women and their providers across partner health systems in Florida and California. Funding will scale empathy-native modules, integrate mCODE and OPTS-EGO into EHRs, and expand peer navigation across faith and language groups. But the true horizon is larger than a market-it is a movement. We are building the infrastructure of empathy: a shared digital commons where data is honored, stories are preserved, and trust compounds with every interaction([Grossman et al.]{.nocase} 2018). Every hospital, advocacy group, and survivor community has a role in shaping this ecosystem, where empathy and evidence are co-equal forms of care. By uniting clinicians, technologists, and patients under a common data language of trust, MammoChat invites partners to join us on this journey-to co-create a future where care listens before it learns, and every woman is not just treated, but truly understood, seen, and remembered.

Dexter Hadley, MD/PhD
Founder & CEO, MammoChat
Lake Nona Medical City, Florida
October 31, 2025

The National Policy Landscape: From Compliance to Connection

Over the last three decades, the United States has built one of the most intricate and progressive frameworks for digital health data in the world. Yet for most patients, those laws remain invisible-legal rights that rarely translate into practical empowerment. MammoChat exists to operationalize those rights, converting compliance into connection and transforming regulatory language into real patient agency.

HIPAA: Access as a Civil Right.(HHS OCR 2003a, 2003b) When Congress enacted the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) in 1996, it defined the right to privacy and access for protected health information (PHI). For the first time, individuals could request their medical records and expect a standardized process for retrieval. HIPAA’s Privacy Rule (45 CFR Parts 160 and 164) and Security Rule (45 CFR 164 Subpart C) laid the foundation for data integrity, confidentiality, and patient consent. Yet HIPAA was never designed for the age of cloud computing, federated learning, or blockchain It safeguarded privacy but did not empower participation.

HITECH: Accountability in the Digital Era. The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of 2009 updated HIPAA for the electronic age. It introduced breach-notification standards and incentives for electronic health records (EHRs). HITECH established the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) as the federal authority to drive interoperability. But even as hospitals digitized, patients found themselves trapped behind portals-able to view but not move their own data.

21st Century Cures Act: Ending Information Blocking(Congress 2016; ONC 2020; HHS OIG 2023; Adler-Milstein and Kesselheim 2021) The 21st Century Cures Act (2016) and its 2020 Final Rule from ONC revolutionized patient data rights. For the first time, information blocking became a punishable offense(Adler-Milstein and Kesselheim 2021; HHS OIG 2023). Health systems, vendors, and payors were required to share patient data through standardized APIs such as FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources) The rule reframed patient data from a corporate asset to a public good. In spirit, it shifted healthcare from closed architecture to open collaboration.

Yet enforcement was slow to follow. By 2023, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) began issuing formal penalties for information blocking, creating real accountability for non-compliant actors. OIG’s framework recognized what patients had known for years-that access delayed is access denied.(ONC 2025b, 2025a)

Policy ecosystem encoded within OPTS–EGO: each badge corresponds to a compliance domain operationalized by MammoChat.

NIH Data Management and Sharing (DMS) Policy. In 2023, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) implemented its DMS Policy, requiring that all federally funded research include a plan for data management, provenance, and public availability. This policy enshrined the principle that taxpayer-funded science must produce reusable, interoperable data assets. The DMS Policy represents a philosophical shift from publication-based accountability to dataset-based accountability-an evolution many of us in the open-data community had long anticipated. It’s no longer enough to publish findings; the underlying data must be accessible, reusable, and verifiable. MammoChat’s OPTS-Grant registry directly aligns with this mandate, transforming deliverables into cryptographically verifiable public goods.

Florida’s Sunshine Law: Transparency as Obligation. Few states embody transparency like Florida. The Sunshine Law (Florida Statutes 119.01) mandates that all state-funded deliverables be publicly accessible. In the context of the $2 M Casey DeSantis Florida Cancer Innovation Grant, this means that code, documentation, and results must be openly available. Through MammoChat’s OPTS-EGO Ledger, each deliverable is minted as a verifiable token-ensuring both compliance with the Sunshine Law and preservation of intellectual provenance.(Hardt 2012; Jones et al. 2015; Rescorla 2018; NIST 2019) In essence, MammoChat’s architecture maps transparency to programmable traceability.

TEFCA and USCDI: Building a National Data Fabric.(ONC 2025b, 2023, 2024b, 2025a, 2024a; HL7 International 2024d) The Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA) and the United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI) provide the technical backbone for a unified national health-data exchange(ONC 2025a, 2025b). Together, they establish the minimum data elements and governance rules that allow EHRs and apps to communicate securely across systems.(Healthcare Enterprise 2023; HL7 International 2024c, 2024a) MammoChat builds upon these standards, ensuring that every piece of patient data stored or shared aligns with the USCDI and can flow across TEFCA networks. Where TEFCA connects institutions, MammoChat connects individuals.

America’s AI Action Plan (2025): Ethics, Transparency, and Trust. In July 2025, the White House released America’s AI Action Plan, outlining a national strategy for safe, responsible, and transparent artificial intelligence. The plan prioritizes three pillars: (1) trustworthy AI development, (2) secure and accessible data infrastructure, and (3) measurable social benefit. MammoChat’s OPTS-EGO Ledger embodies all three. By integrating provenance, auditability, and patient participation, the system transforms regulatory compliance into an engine for ethical innovation. Where other platforms rely on proprietary models, MammoChat’s architecture is open, auditable, and community-governed-a living demonstration of national AI policy in practice.

From Law to Life. These policies form a timeline of intent-from HIPAA’s privacy to HITECH’s accountability, from the Cures Act’s openness to the DMS Policy’s transparency, and finally to the AI Action Plan’s trust. MammoChat is where those intentions converge-a platform that turns statutes into stories and regulation into results For Maria and Zaida, these laws mean more than legal text; they mean being seen, understood, and in control of their data and destiny.

Compliance protects privacy; capability protects people.

mCODE and Provenance: The Grammar of Cancer Data

Structure of the mCODE (STU 2) information model used by MammoChat to translate unstructured oncology records into standardized, interoperable data. The schema aligns core FHIR resources across diagnosis, genomics, therapy, and outcomes to enable cross-institutional research and patient-controlled data sharing.{#fig:mcode_schema width=”98%”}

Every language has grammar-the rules that give meaning to words. In cancer care, that grammar is called mCODE, the Minimal Common Oncology Data Elements. It defines how tumors, treatments, and outcomes are described in digital form. Without mCODE, oncology data remain fragmented, unreadable, and ultimately unusable for large-scale precision medicine.

The Architecture of mCODE. mCODE provides a standardized schema for representing every measurable aspect of cancer-tumor type, histology, receptor status, staging (TNM), procedures, medications, biomarkers, genomic variants, outcomes, and imaging. Each field in mCODE is interoperable with FHIR (Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources)-the API standard that connects modern EHRs and research databases. Where FHIR provides the syntax, mCODE provides the semantics-the shared meaning of the words in the medical sentence.

By design, mCODE is disease-agnostic yet cancer-specific. It can represent a breast lesion, a colon biopsy, or a melanoma recurrence with equal fidelity. MammoChat extends this framework to include breast-specific data elements: mammographic density, BI-RADS classification, pathology subtypes, and genomic signatures (HER2, ER/PR, BRCA). These data elements are not stored as free text; they are structured, coded, and cryptographically signed.

From Structure to Provenance. Structure alone is not trust. To ensure integrity, every mCODE object is registered on the OPTS-EGO Ledger-a cryptographic layer that provides verifiable provenance for each data element.

For each record $i$, we define an Open Provenance Token Standard (OPTS) object: \(\mathrm{OPTS}_i = (D_i, M_i, \sigma_i, \tau_i)\) where $D_i$ is the content-addressed hash of the encrypted payload, $M_i$ is metadata conforming to mCODE/FHIR, $\sigma_i$ is the patient’s digital signature, and $\tau_i$ is a timestamp of consent. The ledger is governed by Ethical Governance Operators (EGO)-validators representing trusted clinical institutions, community stakeholders, and patients themselves.

Each transaction on the ledger creates an immutable proof: \(L_{t+1} = \mathrm{Keccak256}(L_t \,\|\, \mathrm{Tx}_t)\) which ensures that once a record is written, it cannot be altered without detection. A patient’s consent event is represented by a hash $H_i = \mathrm{SHA3}(D_i \,|\, M_i \,|\, \sigma_i)$ and validated through a zero-knowledge proof $Z_i = \mathrm{ZKVerify}(H_i, \sigma_i, P_i)$, verifying policy compliance without revealing personal health information.

Why Provenance Matters. Provenance means knowing where data came from, who touched it, and whether it can be trusted. In medicine, provenance prevents not only fraud but also invisibility-ensuring that the contributions of patients, clinicians, and funders are recorded forever. In research, it prevents data drift and model bias. In patient care, it ensures that results are reproducible, auditable, and portable. And for Maria, it means her imaging and biopsy data will never again be lost in translation.

Intersections of mCODE and Blockchain. MammoChat bridges clinical semantics and cryptographic assurance. mCODE describes the data; OPTS-EGO proves its origin. This combination allows each element of Maria’s care-from a mammogram pixel to a pathology note-to exist as both a clinical artifact and a verified digital asset.

Intersection of mCODE and OPTS-EGO: from structure to provenance.

In practical terms, this architecture allows a hospital, lab, or AI developer to verify the lineage of any dataset before using it in a model. If a researcher trains an algorithm on a de-identified mCODE dataset, the OPTS-EGO Ledger ensures that every contributor s consent and attribution remain intact-a transparent chain of trust.

Provenance as Public Good(Prainsack 2023). Through the $2 M Casey DeSantis Florida Cancer Innovation Grant, each open-source deliverable-code, schema, or model-is registered as an OPTS-Grant token. This ensures that state-funded innovation remains accessible while crediting its original investigators. In doing so, MammoChat creates a living repository of reproducible research, where provenance is not a legal burden but a scientific advantage.

From Provenance to Ownership. In the emerging precision-medicine economy, data itself is the primary resource(Khorfan et al. 2018). By combining mCODE with OPTS-EGO, MammoChat transforms that resource into a renewable asset owned by the people who generate it. Each time a patient contributes data to a study, their consent creates a transaction; each transaction can yield recognition, royalties, or research participation opportunities.

Structure without provenance is information; provenance with consent is power.

Through standardization, security, and empathy, mCODE and OPTS-EGO together define not just how we record cancer, but how we remember the people behind it.

Public Funding Provenance Innovation

Public investment in science is society s boldest act of faith. Every grant carries an expectation that knowledge created with public dollars should, in turn, serve the public good. Yet for decades, tracing where that knowledge goes - and who benefits - has remained opaque. MammoChat’s OPTS-EGO Ledger transforms this expectation into a measurable framework: every publicly funded deliverable becomes a verified, reusable, and attributable digital artifact.

The Casey DeSantis Florida Cancer Innovation Grant. In 2025, the State of Florida awarded a $2 M Cancer Innovation Grant under the leadership of First Lady Casey DeSantis. The grant s objective: to accelerate translation of digital health innovation into community cancer prevention and survivorship. Its mandate was explicit - all resulting code, datasets, and intellectual outputs must be made open source and accessible to the public.

For many institutions, this requirement is administrative; for MammoChat, it became a design principle. Each deliverable is now minted as an OPTS-Grant Token - a cryptographic certificate that records authorship, funding source, and time of creation.

The Provenance Chain of a Grant Deliverable.

Lifecycle of a publicly funded deliverable within the OPTS–EGO Ledger. Each stage builds accountability: from public investment to measurable patient benefit.

Every dataset, model, or line of code is hashed using SHA-3, signed by its principal investigator, and recorded as an immutable entry on the ledger The result is a transparent and permanent record linking public investment to scientific and clinical benefit.

Transparency by Design. Traditional reporting models rely on periodic progress summaries and post-hoc compliance checks The OPTS-Grant Registry replaces this with continuous verification. Each ledger entry contains:

Anyone - auditor, policymaker, or patient - can confirm that a deliverable funded by public money has been created, shared, and preserved. This moves transparency from legal compliance to cryptographic proof.

MammoChat’s Demonstration Deliverables.

Each is registered as an OPTS-Grant Token with open access for reuse by clinicians, developers, and patient advocates.

Ethical Governance and Attribution. In traditional academia, authorship disputes and data hoarding often limit collaboration By contrast, OPTS-Grant Tokens formalize credit at the level of contribution. If a future startup or research team reuses MammoChat’s open-source components, attribution and citation are built into the ledger itself. The result is a self-auditing ecosystem that rewards openness rather than secrecy.(Agrawal et al. 2019)

Economic Flow. The model also closes the loop between public funding and patient benefit.

Public Investment $\rightarrow$ Open Deliverables $\rightarrow$ Innovation Reuse $\rightarrow$ Improved Outcomes $\rightarrow$ Public Trust.

Every reuse generates measurable social and economic return, documented through ledger analytics rather than grant reports.

Why It Matters. When patients like Maria and Zaida access a tool built with state funds, they become part of a transparent continuum - one where their participation feeds directly back into the system that supported them. The $2 M Casey DeSantis Grant thus serves as both catalyst and proof-of-concept: a living example of how provenance transforms public spending into perpetual innovation. Therefore, any similar public-facing reporting, evidence, or evaluation frameworks may adopt our open-source approach to achieve transparent operational efficiency.

Public trust is the ultimate currency of healthcare. Provenance is how we earn it back.

iCORPS Market Insights: Listening Before Scaling

MammoChat’s market strategy was born not in a boardroom but in conversation - more than eighty structured interviews conducted under the National Science Foundation’s I-Corps program Those conversations formed the foundation of our product-market fit, revealing one truth that spanned every segment of the healthcare ecosystem: trust is the scarcest commodity in medicine.

Patient Segment: Trust, Language, and Belonging. Patients were the emotional core of our discovery process. They described confusion navigating portals, fear of data misuse, and the loneliness of an English-dominant healthcare system. Bilingual patients wanted an interface that could explain imaging and pathology results in human terms - not clinical jargon - and they wanted peer connection as much as clinical precision. This became the blueprint for MammoChat’s empathetic conversational layer and multilingual community-matching engine.

I don t want another app - I want a voice that understands me.

Provider Segment: Efficiency and Liability. Physicians and radiologists described an environment of burnout and administrative overload. They needed technology that reduced risk, not added another compliance portal. MammoChat’s integration with existing PACS and FHIR APIs allows providers to document consent and share imaging with one click, while the OPTS-EGO Ledger maintains immutable audit trails for every access event. This combination lowers documentation burden, improves patient communication, and provides defensible legal provenance.(HHS OCR 2003a, 2003b; Congress 2016)

Payor Segment: Transparency and Outcome Metrics. Insurers and accountable-care organizations (ACOs) are under pressure to link reimbursement to outcomes. They viewed MammoChat as a bridge between patient engagement and measurable quality metrics. By embedding standardized mCODE data, the platform can quantify adherence, early detection, and survivorship outcomes - turning provenance into actuarial intelligence. Payors see this as a path to value-based contracting grounded in verified patient consent.

Pharma and Life-Sciences Segment: Recruitment and Real-World Data. Clinical-trial sponsors struggle with recruiting diverse populations and maintaining compliant data provenance. Through its OPTS-EGO architecture, MammoChat enables zero-knowledge trial matching - verifying eligibility without revealing personal health data. This mechanism addresses one of the industry s largest friction points: finding the right patients without violating privacy. Pharma executives called it the missing link between diversity mandates and ethical data sourcing. (Knoppers and Chadwick 2005)

Developer Segment: Standardization and Open APIs. Independent developers and AI startups often face regulatory paralysis - the fear of building non-compliant tools MammoChat exposes a secure, documented API layer aligned with FHIR, USCDI, and mCODE standards This allows third parties to innovate without re-solving compliance or provenance from scratch. In essence, MammoChat becomes the trust layer for healthcare-AI development - an SDK for empathy and ethics.

Regulator Segment: Enforcement and Verification. Federal and state regulators, including ONC and OIG officials interviewed during I-Corps discovery, emphasized the need for verifiable compliance. MammoChat’s ledger-based architecture produces cryptographically provable logs that satisfy audit requirements for HIPAA, HITECH, and the 21st Century Cures Act. This transforms the reporting process from periodic audits to continuous verification - a feature regulators immediately recognized as future-proof accountability.

Academic and Research Segment: Provenance and Reproducibility. University researchers and NIH-funded teams voiced frustration with reproducibility crises in AI and bioinformatics. By combining mCODE standardization with OPTS-EGO provenance, MammoChat offers a transparent, citable pipeline from data acquisition to publication. Each dataset or model can be uniquely referenced by ledger hash, satisfying both NIH DMS and journal reproducibility mandates.

Quantifying the Opportunity. The total addressable market (TAM) for breast-health data ecosystems exceeds $12 B in the United States and $50 B globally by 2030, driven by imaging AI, tele-oncology, and decentralized clinical trials Within this landscape, MammoChat occupies the intersection of:

Combining these verticals creates a composite growth opportunity exceeding $60 B, with early-stage differentiation in empathy, compliance, and multilingual access.

The Lesson from I-Corps(National Science Foundation 2025). Lean innovation begins with humility. Our interviews revealed that empathy is not a marketing advantage - it is a market necessity. Patients trust those who listen; providers trust systems that document; payors trust data that prove outcomes. MammoChat unites all three.

Trust is the product. AI is the interface. Provenance is the proof.

Empathy Architecture: Engineering Digital Bedside Manner

Medicine begins with listening. Technology, for too long, has not. MammoChat was designed to change that-not only to deliver information, but to deliver it kindly. Every aspect of the platform, from chat interactions to data visualization, follows a design philosophy we call Empathy Architecture-a model that encodes compassion, clarity, and cultural context into the language of algorithms. This approach improves patient-reported outcomes, experience, and health literacy.

The Design Challenge. Lessons from implementation science, market design, and data governance show that traditional healthcare applications emphasize compliance and throughput: fill the form, click submit, wait for review. For patients facing a diagnosis, this mechanical precision often feels alienating. Our I-Corps interviews revealed a recurring phrase: I feel like a number. The goal of MammoChat’s empathy architecture is to transform those numbers back into narratives-to make digital interaction feel human, multilingual, and kind.

Core Principles of Empathy Architecture.

extbfThe Empathetic System Prompt. At the core of the chat model lies an engineered script derived from the open-source repository HadleyLab/nicegui_chat. It defines how the AI thinks, listens, and responds-a kind of Hippocratic Oath for digital communication.

System Prompt:
You are MammoChat, an empathetic breast-health companion. Listen first. Reflect feelings. Explain clearly. Offer support, not judgment. Always preserve the patient’s agency and cultural context.

This single paragraph of code defines a personality: one that listens, translates, and reassures. It is the moral center of the platform-empathy rendered as algorithm.

Behavioral Loop: From Distress to Dialogue. Each conversation follows a four-step behavioral model rooted in cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and motivational interviewing:

  1. Acknowledge Emotion-detect affective cues and reflect understanding.

  2. Clarify Context-ensure comprehension of medical terms and next steps.

  3. Empower Action-present options for care, consent, or connection.

  4. Reinforce Belonging-connect the patient to peer communities or clinical resources.

MammoChat’s empathetic dialogue loop: from distress to belonging.

extbfCultural and Linguistic Intelligence. Empathy is inseparable from language.(HL7 International 2024a; PLAIN 2023) MammoChat uses a multilingual language model trained across patient narratives to maintain emotional precision independent of translation. Rather than literal substitution, the system adapts phrasing to context- No est s sola ( You are not alone ) replaces You re fine, because comfort requires culture. This linguistic intelligence enables real inclusion: care that feels personal, not perfunctory.

UX Design: The Aesthetics of Safety. Visual empathy is as vital as verbal empathy. MammoChat’s interface follows accessibility-first design with soft typography, clear contrast, and a calming color palette. Users are greeted with reassurance and clarity, not dashboards or metrics. Critical alerts are accompanied by explanations, not exclamation points.

Empathy as Measurable Outcome. MammoChat’s forthcoming $12 M Series A raise is for a demonstration study that defines empathy itself as a primary endpoint. User trust, engagement duration, and anxiety reduction are measurable proxies for emotional safety. These metrics are validated through psychometric scales (GAD-7, PHQ-9) and behavioral analytics (drop-off rates, response latency). The hypothesis is simple: empathy increases retention, and retention increases both clinical value and economic sustainability.

extbfA New Kind of Infrastructure.([Pentland et al.]{.nocase} 2014) By integrating empathy into AI architecture, MammoChat bridges the human and technical divides that fragment healthcare. It is software that listens, learns, and loves-a phrase often laughed at in tech but necessary in medicine. Empathy Architecture is not just an interface layer; it is the connective tissue of a system where trust becomes the foundation of precision care.

We don t build empathy on top of technology. We build technology on top of empathy.

The Precision Medicine Economy: Patients as Shareholders

In the 20th century, the world s wealth was built on energy and industry. In the 21st, it will be built on data and trust. Healthcare, once powered by infrastructure and insurance, is now driven by information - who has it, how it moves, and who controls its value. MammoChat’s OPTS-EGO Ledger transforms that reality by defining a new class of asset: the verified, patient-consented data token. This is the foundation of the patient-owned precision medicine economy.

From Extraction to Equity. For decades, patient data has fueled scientific discovery and corporate innovation - often without the patient’s knowledge, consent, or benefit Electronic health records became warehouses; clinical trials became data pipelines; AI startups built valuations on anonymized lives. MammoChat proposes an inversion: the individuals who generate the data should share in its value. The system is designed to make that equity measurable and automatic.

How Value Flows. When a patient like Zaida uploads her mammogram or biopsy record, the data are standardized into mCODE, encrypted, and notarized on the OPTS-EGO Ledger. That single act of consent creates an ownership event(Congress 2010). Each subsequent reuse - whether for clinical care, AI model training, or academic research - generates a traceable transaction recorded in the ledger. Depending on policy and participation level, that transaction can yield attribution, recognition, or micro-royalty credit.

\(R_p = \alpha I + \beta S + \gamma D\) where $R_p$ is the patient’s total return, composed of intangible impact ($I$), social value ($S$), and data-derived royalty ($D$), with weighting coefficients $\alpha + \beta + \gamma = 1$.

The same infrastructure that once anonymized patients now rehumanizes them, quantifying their role in discovery.

Circular Data Economy. Public funds seed research; open deliverables generate innovation; patient data validate models; improved outcomes justify reinvestment. MammoChat formalizes this virtuous cycle through transparent economics.

The circular data economy with orthogonal flow: empathy drives consent, provenance drives equity.

In this model, empathy drives participation; provenance drives accountability; and transparency drives reinvestment. Every actor - from the patient to the policymaker - can trace how value is created and shared.

Alignment with Policy and Market Trends. The patient-owned economy does not operate in a vacuum. It sits at the intersection of multiple converging trends

MammoChat stands at the confluence of all five - a platform that turns compliance into commerce and compassion into capital.

Trust as Currency. In a data-driven economy, trust is the ultimate unit of value. Every OPTS-EGO transaction is a trust event, backed by both mathematics and morality. The more trustworthy the system, the more valuable its data. That is why empathy is not a feature - it is a financial instrument. It increases participation rates, reduces attrition, and amplifies data quality. In this way, compassion compounds.

Long-Term Vision: Patient-Owned AI. By 2030, the global precision-medicine market is expected to exceed $200 B, with AI-driven analytics representing 40 % of total value creation. MammoChat envisions a future where patients not only contribute data to AI models but co-own the resulting insights. Through OPTS-EGO’s governance mechanism, community participants can hold collective equity in the datasets that train medical algorithms - the first real form of patient dividend in the digital age.

Ethical Dividends. The value of this new economy is not just financial; it is moral. When patients see tangible benefit from their participation - improved care, shared credit, or reinvested royalties - they trust the system that asks for their data. That trust, in turn, expands the scope and quality of research. It is a self-sustaining loop in which empathy and economics reinforce each other.

Data built the 21st century. Empathy will own it.

MammoChat’s OPTS-EGO Ledger is not merely an infrastructure for interoperability - it is the architecture of a new social contract, where the value of precision medicine finally flows back to the people who make it possible.

Implementation Roadmap (2025–2030)

+——————–+——————————————————————————+—————————————————————————————————————-+——————————————————————————–+ | Year / Quarter | Phase | Key Deliverables and Milestones | Impact / Partners | +:===================+:=============================================================================+:===============================================================================================================+:===============================================================================+ | 2025 Q4 | Public Launch - "Closing Breast Cancer Awareness Month with Open Data" | - Launch MammoChat.com and OPTS–EGO Ledger v1.0 (Halloween). | Lake Nona Medical City launch; AdventHealth; Florida Cancer Innovation Network | | | | | | | | | - mCODE Translator API for clinical data conversion. | | | | | | | | | | - Bilingual empathy chat (nicegui_chat) pilot cohort. | | | | | | | | | | - Register Casey DeSantis Grant deliverables on OPTS–Grant Registry. | | +——————–+——————————————————————————+—————————————————————————————————————-+——————————————————————————–+ | 2026 Q1-Q4 | Clinical Demonstration & Integration | - Raise $12 M Series A for empathy + provenance demonstration study. | UCF alumni network; AdventHealth; UCSF collaborators; Patient Advocacy Council | | | | | | | | | - HIPAA/HITECH audit and certification for OPTS–EGO. | | | | | | | | | | - Pilots with Florida/California hospital systems. | | | | | | | | | | - 1st Annual MammoChat Summit (Halloween, Lake Nona)-clinicians, technologists, survivors, policy leaders. | | +——————–+——————————————————————————+—————————————————————————————————————-+——————————————————————————–+ | 2027 | National Expansion & AI Validation | - Scale OPTS–EGO to national network. | NIH/NCI; ONC; National Payor Partners | | | | | | | | | - Integrate mCODE registries with NIH/ONC frameworks. | | | | | | | | | | - AI trust audit to measure bias reduction via provenance. | | | | | | | | | | - Publish Empathy as an Algorithm - Demonstration Outcomes. | | +——————–+——————————————————————————+—————————————————————————————————————-+——————————————————————————–+ | 2028 | Global Partnerships & Interoperability | - Expand to Latin America / Europe via WHO Digital Health Ethics Network. | WHO; European Commission; Latin American Cancer Networks | | | | | | | | | - Add Portuguese, French, Hindi. | | | | | | | | | | - Deploy GDPR-compliant international nodes. | | | | | | | | | | - Licensing framework for nonprofit / academic adoption. | | +——————–+——————————————————————————+—————————————————————————————————————-+——————————————————————————–+ | 2029 | Series B & Ecosystem Growth | - Secure Series B; scale infrastructure and user base. | Private Equity; Strategic Pharma Partners; Patient Equity Participants | | | | | | | | | - 1 M verified users contributing anonymized data. | | | | | | | | | | - MammoChat Developer SDK for third-party integrations. | | | | | | | | | | - Pharma / device partnerships for patient-owned trials. | | +——————–+——————————————————————————+—————————————————————————————————————-+——————————————————————————–+ | 2030 | Global DAO for Patient-Owned AI Research | - Transition OPTS–EGO to DAO with tokenized attribution. | MammoChat Foundation; International Digital Health Partners | | | | | | | | | - Shared governance for contributors. | | | | | | | | | | - Establish MammoChat Foundation for open, equitable research. | | +——————–+——————————————————————————+—————————————————————————————————————-+——————————————————————————–+

MammoChat’s trajectory from prototype to platform follows a structured five-year plan that integrates scientific validation, policy alignment, and community growth. Each phase advances a single unifying goal: to transform empathy, provenance, and patient data into the backbone of the precision-medicine economy.(Prainsack 2023; Global Alliance for Genomics and Health 2014; World Health Organization 2021)

Q4 2025 - Public Launch. Halloween marks the transition of MammoChat from research to reality. The public release of MammoChat.com introduces the OPTS–EGO Ledger v1.0 for consent provenance, the mCODE Translator API for data standardization, and the bilingual empathy chat (nicegui_chat). Initial metrics focus on user trust, bilingual engagement, and reduction in digital anxiety.

2026 - Demonstration and Clinical Integration. The $12 M demonstration validates how empathy and provenance improve outcomes. Deliverables: integrations with Florida/California health systems, third-party HIPAA/HITECH audit, and the OPTS–Grant Registry. This phase demonstrates proof of capability (trust, participation, trial enrollment).

2027 - National Expansion and AI Validation. The ledger scales to a multi-site network. Focus: payor partnerships for value-based validation, NIH/ONC mCODE registry integration, and AI trustworthiness audit with provenance-controlled datasets.

2028 - Global Partnerships and Interoperability. International expansion (Latin America, Europe) with WHO Digital Health Ethics Network; deploy GDPR-compliant nodes; multi-language support (Portuguese, French, Hindi); licensing for academic / nonprofit use.

2029 - Series B and Ecosystem Growth. Series B to scale operations; reach one million verified users; expand pharma/device partnerships; release the MammoChat Developer SDK.

2030 - Global DAO for Patient-Owned AI Research. Transition to a patient-owned DAO with tokenized attribution and shared governance-extending the OPTS–EGO Ledger into a global commons for ethical AI in medicine.

Appendix - Technical Foundations and Compliance Proofs {#appendix—technical-foundations-and-compliance-proofs .unnumbered}

A.7 Notation Reference {#a.7-notation-reference .unnumbered}

The following notation summarizes mathematical and symbolic conventions used throughout the MammoChat OPTS-EGO technical framework.

Symbol Meaning / Description ————————- ——————————————————————————————————————————————– $\mathrm{OPTS}i$ Open Provenance Token Standard object for data record $i$; unit of verifiable consent and authorship. $D_i$ Encrypted payload digest for record $i$ (SHA-3 hash of content). $M_i$ Metadata conforming to FHIR / mCODE schema (fields: diagnosis, genomics, imaging, therapy)(Global Alliance for Genomics and Health 2022a). $\sigma_i$ Patient’s digital signature (asymmetric keypair, EGO-verified). $\tau_i$ Timestamp of consent or ledger entry (UTC ISO 8601 format). $L_t$ Ledger state hash at time $t$; maintained as append-only chain via $\mathrm{Keccak256}(L_t \,|\, \mathrm{Tx}_t)$. $\mathrm{Tx}_t$ Transaction record at block $t$ (e.g., consent, data upload, audit event). $H_i$ SHA-3 commitment $H_i=\mathrm{SHA3}(D_i|!M_i|!\sigma_i)$ used in ZKP verification. $Z_i$ Zero-knowledge proof verifying that transaction $i$ satisfies policy $P_i$ without PHI exposure. $P_i$ Policy constraint (e.g., HIPAA minimum-necessary rule or 21 Cures Act exception). $R_p$ Patient’s total return: $R_p = \alpha I + \beta S + \gamma D$, composite of impact, social, and data royalty. $I, S, D$ Components of patient value: Intangible impact, Social benefit, Data-derived royalty. $\alpha, \beta, \gamma$ Weighting coefficients ($\alpha+\beta+\gamma=1$) determining distribution of patient returns. $Y_v$ Validator yield: $Y_v=\eta\cdot\mathrm{Stake}\cdot\mathrm{Uptime}\cdot\mathrm{Quality}$. $\eta$ Policy-compliance multiplier (EGO-governance parameter). $V_j$ Validator $j$ in EGO consensus network. $\rho{jk}$ Governance reputation weight for validator $j$ on policy $k$. $\epsilon$ Differential-privacy budget controlling trade-off between privacy and accuracy. $M(x)$ Randomized mechanism generating output distribution over dataset $x$(Schulz et al. 2010). $KG=(V,E,\Phi)$ Knowledge Graph representation: vertices $V$, edges $E$, and feature embeddings $\Phi$. $\Phi$ Learned vector embeddings from transformer-based or graph-neural models for cohort discovery. DAO Decentralized Autonomous Organization governing OPTS-EGO in 2030 phase(Ben-Sasson et al. 2014; W3C 2022). EGO Ethical Governance Operators-human or institutional validators enforcing consensus. mCODE Minimal Common Oncology Data Elements standard for oncology interoperability. FHIR Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources API specification for EHR exchange(HL7 International 2019).

Purpose. Standardizing notation ensures reproducibility across future publications, interoperability with HL7 FHIR / mCODE implementations, and formal alignment with provenance ontologies such as PROV-O and RO-Crate.

“Provenance is policy written in mathematics.”

A.1 Cryptographic Architecture {#a.1-cryptographic-architecture .unnumbered}

The OPTS-EGO Ledger is a hybrid architecture combining distributed hash ledgers, zero-knowledge proofs (ZKPs), and verifiable credentials Its goal is to guarantee provenance, enforce consent, and enable reproducible science without exposing protected health information (PHI). The framework conforms to security and exchange standards for healthcare identity and device interoperability

Each data object $i$ (mammogram, pathology report, genomic file) is represented as: \(\mathrm{OPTS}_i = (D_i, M_i, \sigma_i, \tau_i)\) where:

Ledger updates follow an append-only hash chain ensuring immutability and traceability.

A consent transaction records: \(H_i = \mathrm{SHA3}(D_i + M_i + \sigma_i)\) and a zero-knowledge proof:(Partala et al. 2020) \(Z_i = \mathrm{ZKVerify}(H_i, \sigma_i, P_i)\) proving that the transaction satisfies policy $P_i$ (e.g., HIPAA minimum-necessary, 21st Century Cures exceptions) without revealing underlying PHI.

A.2 Security and HIPAA Constructive Compliance {#a.2-security-and-hipaa-constructive-compliance .unnumbered}

Definition (HIPAA Compliance). A system is compliant if it enforces access control, ensures integrity and confidentiality of electronic PHI (ePHI), and maintains auditable activity logs per 45 CFR §164.306–312.

Lemma 1 (Access Minimality). Every OPTS transaction $r$ reveals only policy-satisfying attributes through $Z=\mathrm{ZKVerify}(H,\sigma,P)$, maintaining minimum-necessary disclosure.

Lemma 2 (Immutable Auditability). All updates to the ledger follow $L_{t+1}=\mathrm{Keccak256}(L_t + \mathrm{Tx}_t)$, producing an immutable, append-only audit chain.

Lemma 3 (Confidentiality and Integrity). AES-256-GCM encryption and SHA-3 commitments guarantee data confidentiality and integrity under standard cryptographic assumptions.

Theorem (Constructive Compliance). If Lemmas 1–3 hold and validators $V_j$ are weighted by governance reputation $\rho_{jk}>0$, then the OPTS–EGO Ledger enforces HIPAA administrative, technical, and physical safeguards by design. $\square$

A.3 Privacy and Differential Guarantees {#a.3-privacy-and-differential-guarantees .unnumbered}

Differential-privacy mechanisms ensure aggregate data sharing without individual exposure: \(P(M(x) \in S) \le e^{\epsilon} P(M(x') \in S)\) where $\epsilon$ controls the privacy budget MammoChat’s data exports apply adaptive noise calibration tuned for healthcare sensitivity.

A.4 Tokenomics and Circular Flow {#a.4-tokenomics-and-circular-flow .unnumbered}

The economic model ensures that patient participation generates measurable and ethical returns.

Patient Royalty Model: \(R_p = \alpha I + \beta S + \gamma D, \qquad \alpha + \beta + \gamma = 1\) where:

Validator Yield Function: \(Y_v = \eta \cdot \mathrm{Stake} \cdot \mathrm{Uptime} \cdot \mathrm{Quality}\) where $\eta$ is the policy-compliance multiplier governed by EGO consensus.

Empathetic dialogue loop with orthogonal nodes: Acknowledge → Clarify → Empower → Reinforce → (loop).

A.5 Knowledge Graph for Precision Medicine {#a.5-knowledge-graph-for-precision-medicine .unnumbered}

The ledger integrates with a dynamic graph database $KG=(V,E,\Phi)$, where:(National Center for Biotechnology Information 2025; Broad Institute 2025)

This structure allows efficient retrieval of trial eligibility and cohort discovery while preserving individual privacy.

A.6 Future Work: Formal Verification and DAO Governance {#a.6-future-work-formal-verification-and-dao-governance .unnumbered}

Future phases will include:

Summary. The OPTS–EGO Ledger transforms compliance from static documentation into active proof, enabling a trustworthy infrastructure for patient-owned AI and precision medicine.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: {#refs .references .csl-bib-body .hanging-indent} ::: {#ref-adlermilstein2021jama .csl-entry} Adler-Milstein, Julia, and Aaron S. Kesselheim. 2021. “Information Blocking: Is It Real and What to Do about It?” JAMA 325 (2): 115–16.

::: {#ref-goldfarb2019book .csl-entry} Agrawal, Ajay, Joshua Gans, and Avi Goldfarb. 2019. The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda. University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226613475.001.0001.

::: {#ref-bensasson2014ieee .csl-entry} Ben-Sasson, Eli, Alessandro Chiesa, Daniel Genkin, Eran Tromer, and Madars Virza. 2014. “Zerocash: Decentralized Anonymous Payments from Bitcoin.” 2014 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (San Jose, CA, USA), 459–74. https://doi.org/10.1109/SP.2014.36.

::: {#ref-gnomad .csl-entry} Broad Institute. 2025. gnomAD: Genome Aggregation Database. https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/.

::: {#ref-plainwritingact2010 .csl-entry} Congress, U. S. 2010. Plain Writing Act of 2010. https://www.congress.gov/bill/111th-congress/house-bill/946.

::: {#ref-cures_act_2016 .csl-entry} Congress, U. S. 2016. 21st Century Cures Act (Pub. L. 114-255). https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/34.

::: {#ref-ga4gh_policy .csl-entry} Global Alliance for Genomics and Health. 2014. Framework for Responsible Sharing of Genomic and Health-Related Data. https://www.ga4gh.org/genomic-data-toolkit/regulatory-ethics-toolkit/framework-for-responsible-sharing-of-genomic-and-health-related-data/.

::: {#ref-ga4gh_phenopackets .csl-entry} Global Alliance for Genomics and Health. 2022a. Phenopackets: Exchange Standard for Phenotypic Information. https://phenopacket-schema.readthedocs.io/en/latest/.

::: {#ref-ga4gh_vr .csl-entry} Global Alliance for Genomics and Health. 2022b. Variation Representation: Standard for Representing Genomic Variation. https://vr-spec.readthedocs.io/en/latest/.

::: {#ref-grossman2018cellsystems .csl-entry} [Grossman, Robert L. et al.]{.nocase} 2018. “A Data Commons for Discovery.” Cell Syst. 6 (1): 13–17.

::: {#ref-oauth2_rfc6749 .csl-entry} Hardt, D. 2012. The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Framework (RFC 6749). https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6749.

::: {#ref-ihe_xdsb .csl-entry} Healthcare Enterprise, Integrating the. 2023. Cross-Enterprise Document Sharing (XDS.b). https://profiles.ihe.net/ITI/TF/Volume1/ch-10.html.

::: {#ref-hipaa_privacy .csl-entry} HHS OCR. 2003a. HIPAA Privacy Rule. U.S. Department of Health; Human Services. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/index.html.

::: {#ref-hipaa_security .csl-entry} HHS OCR. 2003b. HIPAA Security Rule. U.S. Department of Health; Human Services. https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/security/index.html.

::: {#ref-oig_infoblocking_penalties .csl-entry} HHS OIG. 2023. Civil Monetary Penalties for Information Blocking. https://oig.hhs.gov/compliance/information-blocking/.

::: {#ref-hl7_fhir_r4 .csl-entry} HL7 International. 2019. FHIR Release 4 (R4) Specification. https://www.hl7.org/fhir/.

::: {#ref-hl7_cql .csl-entry} HL7 International. 2024a. Clinical Quality Language (CQL). https://cql.hl7.org/.

::: {#ref-fhir_provenance .csl-entry} HL7 International. 2024b. FHIR Resource: Provenance. Https://hl7.org/fhir/provenance.html{.uri}.

::: {#ref-fhir_terminology .csl-entry} HL7 International. 2024c. FHIR Terminology Services. https://hl7.org/fhir/terminology-service.html.

::: {#ref-hl7_mcode_stu3 .csl-entry} HL7 International. 2024d. mCODE FHIR Implementation Guide (STU 3). https://mcodeinitiative.org/.

::: {#ref-jwt_rfc7519 .csl-entry} Jones, M., J. Bradley, and N. Sakimura. 2015. JSON Web Token (JWT) (RFC 7519). https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc7519.

::: {#ref-khorfan2018meta .csl-entry} Khorfan, Kamal, Jihad Aljabban, Laraib Safeer, et al. 2018. “Meta-Analysis to Identify Emerging Biomarkers of Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Pathogenesis.” In Journal of Clinical Oncology, vol. 36. American Society of Clinical Oncology.

::: {#ref-knoppers2005nrg .csl-entry} Knoppers, Bartha M., and Ruth Chadwick. 2005. “Human Genetic Research: Emerging Benefit-Sharing Models.” Nature Reviews Genetics 6: 931–38.

::: {#ref-dbgap .csl-entry} National Center for Biotechnology Information. 2025. dbGaP: Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gap.

::: {#ref-nsf_icorps .csl-entry} National Science Foundation. 2025. NSF i-Corps Program Overview. https://www.nsf.gov/icorps.

::: {#ref-fips_140_3 .csl-entry} NIST. 2019. FIPS 140-3: Security Requirements for Cryptographic Modules. https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/fips/140/3/final.

::: {#ref-onc_cures_finalrule_2020 .csl-entry} ONC. 2020. 21st Century Cures Act: Interoperability, Information Blocking, and the ONC Health IT Certification Program (Final Rule). https://www.healthit.gov/curesrule/.

::: {#ref-uscdi_v4 .csl-entry} ONC. 2023. USCDI Version 4. https://www.healthit.gov/isa/united-states-core-data-interoperability-uscdi.

::: {#ref-tefca_qhin .csl-entry} ONC. 2024a. TEFCA: Qualified Health Information Networks (QHINs). https://www.healthit.gov/tefca/participants.

::: {#ref-uscdi_v5 .csl-entry} ONC. 2024b. USCDI Version 5. https://www.healthit.gov/isa/united-states-core-data-interoperability-uscdi.

::: {#ref-tefca .csl-entry} ONC. 2025a. Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA). https://www.healthit.gov/tefca.

::: {#ref-uscdi .csl-entry} ONC. 2025b. United States Core Data for Interoperability (USCDI). https://www.healthit.gov/USCDI.

::: {#ref-zk_survey2020 .csl-entry} Partala, Juha, Tri Hong Nguyen, and Susanna Pirttikangas. 2020. “Non-Interactive Zero-Knowledge for Blockchain: A Survey.” IEEE Access 8: 227945–61. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3046025.

::: {#ref-pentland2014hbr .csl-entry} [Pentland, Alex et al.]{.nocase} 2014. A New Deal on Data. https://hbr.org/2014/10/a-new-deal-on-data.

::: {#ref-plain_guidelines .csl-entry} PLAIN. 2023. Federal Plain Language Guidelines. https://www.plainlanguage.gov/guidelines/.

::: {#ref-prainsack2023book .csl-entry} Prainsack, Barbara. 2023. The Value of Health Data: Justice, Markets and the Common Good. Polity. https://politybooks.com/bookdetail/?isbn=9781509552546.

::: {#ref-tls13_rfc8446 .csl-entry} Rescorla, E. 2018. The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol Version 1.3 (RFC 8446). https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8446.

::: {#ref-robinson2020bmjqs .csl-entry} [Robinson, Lloyd et al.]{.nocase} 2020. “Measuring Fragmentation of Care.” BMJ Qual. Saf. 29: 1003–14.

::: {#ref-consort2010 .csl-entry} Schulz, Kenneth F., Douglas G. Altman, and David Moher. 2010. “CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials.” BMJ 340: c332. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c332.

::: {#ref-w3c_did_2022 .csl-entry} W3C. 2022. Decentralized Identifiers (DIDs) V1.0: Core Architecture, Data Model, and Representations. https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/.

::: {#ref-who_ai_ethics_2021 .csl-entry} World Health Organization. 2021. Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Health. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240029200.

::: {#ref-prov_o_w3c .csl-entry} World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). 2013. PROV-o: The PROV Ontology. Https://www.w3.org/TR/prov-o/{.uri}.

CANONIC ∩ FOUNDATION
TALK AUTO